|
Click here for proven solution to eradicate terrorism and create world peace |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
CAMPAIGN TO
BAN
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| What
is Genetic engineering?
What is needed? What is the position now? Genetic Engineering - the dangers Global threat to food supply What you can do Books & Literature Other related sites |
THE NATURAL LAW PARTY is extremely concerned about the development and marketing of genetically modified organisms whether they are used in agriculture, food, or food processing. The Party has been campaigning for the past 18 months for a complete ban on these products in the interests of food safety and the environment.
Genetically engineered foods containing genes derived from animals, fish, insects and bacteria are now starting to appear in the shops. The genetic changes now being made in the nation's food are completely different to those resulting from traditional methods of breeding. Yet, the sale of these foods is being permitted without proper assessment of the risks and without adequately informing the public, even though many scientists say that genetically modified foods could cause serious damage to health and the environment.
Genes
are the blueprints for every part of an organism. Genetic engineering
is the process of modifying this information, particularly by artificially
transferring the genes specific to one type of organism into another.
Scientists
want to transfer desirable qualities from one organism to another,
for example, to make a crop resistant to a herbicide or to enhance
food value.
At first sight it may seem appealing. However, closer examination of the issues gives a different picture. After BSE and other food scares, we should by now all be alert to the dangers of interfering with Nature. We already have the ability to feed the world's population economically without the risks posed by genetic engineering. Commercial and political motives are taking precedence with little regard to the possible dangers.
The artificially induced characteristics and inevitable imperfections
will be passed on to all subsequent generations and to other related
and unrelated organisms. They can never be recalled or contained.
The consequences of this are incalculable. Scientific
facts demonstrating the need for an immediate worldwide ban
Genetically
modified foods available, or about to appear, in UK shops include
tomatoes, yeast, maize, and soya (which is used in many processed
foods, such as bread, pasta, confectionery, ice cream, pies, biscuits,
margarine, meat products and vegetarian meat substitutes). Products
derived from genetically modified organisms are also used to produce
cheeses and rape-seed oil. But this is just the beginning. In a
few years it may be almost impossible to find natural food.
The risk assessment used by government regulators in approving genetically
engineered foods is completely inadequate. The basic principle they
have adopted is that of "substantial equivalence". This
means that if a modified food is deemed to have substantially the
same nutritional value as its natural, unmodified counterpart then
only very limited testing is required. Unfortunately, this principle
requires that only known potential hazards are checked. The criteria
laid down fail to acknowledge the unpredictability inherent in the
methods used in genetic modification. Therefore, current health
testing prior to marketing will not detect any unexpected effects
which may appear either immediately or at any time in the future.
Unexpected toxins and allergens will be discovered only when a major
health problem arises (such situations have already occurred - see
following page). This is why it is vital that there is at least
full-disclosure labelling, without which it will never be possible
even to trace the source of a problem. However, it is clear that
with the risks involved, even full-disclosure labelling does not
go far enough.
The long-term effects on health and the environment are currently
almost completely ignored by government regulations.
Under current regulations, most genetically modified foods will
not be labelled. Foods that meet the criteria for being Òsubstantially
equivalentÓ by the legislative criteria need not be labelled. in
particular, this includes processed foods. This means that at least
80% of genetically modified foods will not be labelled and it has
been left to manufacturers and retailers to decide whether to label
or not. By having such inadequate regulation, the government is
ignoring the wishes of the public Ð a survey by the Consumers Association
found that 93% of consumers want clear labelling of all such foods.
The
introduction of genetically engineered foods amounts to a dangerous
global experiment by giant transnational biotechnology companies
who control large segments of the world's food supply, including
food patents, seed companies and other aspects of the food chain.
Short term commercial gain is being placed before the health and
safety of the whole population. This could result in many unanticipated,
irreversible problems leading to food shortages and large-scale
health threats.
There is no logical scientific justification to change suddenly
almost all our foods through irreversible genetic engineering. The
genetic structure of plants has been nourishing mankind for millennia.
Tampering with the genetic code of food is reckless and poses a
serious threat to life. It could easily upset the delicate balance
between our physiology and the foods that we eat. There is already
ample scientific justification for an immediate ban on the release
of all genetically modified organisms in order to safeguard our
health.
What is needed?It is quite clear even from existing research that a ban on genetically engineered foods and a moratorium on the release of all genetically modified organisms is essential to protect health.In the meantime, labelling should be required for all foods which contain any genetically modified ingredient, even if it is only one, or where genetically modified organisms have been used in the production of the food. Full-disclosure labelling will allow consumers to choose what they eat. It will also help scientists trace the source of health problems that may arise from these foods. |
![]() |
Click here to support this campaign, and to order information, leaflets etc. Natural Law Party Manifesto & Genetic Engineering Information Sheet Available from address at bottom of page |
NLP
Wessex (up to date information about genetic engineering)
NLP
Wessex (list of warning quotations from scientists)
NLP
Wessex (GMO campaign in USA)
NLP
Wessex (GM agriculture)
www.shef.ac.uk/uni/projects/doe/pre93.htm
(listing of genetically modified organisms released in the UK)
www.shef.ac.uk/uni/projects/doe/pubreg.htm
(gives the names and addresses where public registers of genetically
modified organisms released in the UK may be found)
|
Genetic
Engineering contents
|
|
NLP Submission Statement from Dr Michael Antoniou Statement from Dr Geoffrey Clements Press release |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful
references:
|
|
|